Section B - Historical Precedents – JURISPRUDENTIAL THESIS EMITTED BY THE SUPERIOR CHAMBER OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE.- THE APPLICATION OF THE IRRETROACTIVITY PRINCIPLE IS CONDITIONED TO THE HIERARCHY PRECEDENT OF THE ISSUING ORGAN. Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – PUBLIC FAME EVIDENCE. ITS ASSESSMENT AT THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING. Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – EXPERT OPINION. ITS EVIDENTIARY VALUE DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF ITS CONCLUSIONS. Read
Section A - Legal Communication from our Members – HOGAN LOVELLS – Employers’ Implications regarding the Coronavirus Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSPARENCY, ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. IS INCOMPETENT BY TERRITORY TO INITIATE THE PROCEDURE OF RECOGNITION OF DATA PROTECTION AGAINST ESTABLISHMENTS THAT ARE NOT LOCATED IN NATIONAL TERRITORY. Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – PRESUMPTION OF INEXISTENCE OF OPERATIONS. MOTIVATION OF THE OFFICIAL LETTER WITH WHICH THE PROCEDURE REGULATED IN ARTICLE 69-B OF THE FEDERAL TAX CODE IS INITIATED. Read
Section A - Legal Communication from our Members – HOGAN LOVELLS – COVID-19 Action Guide applicable for Work Establishments Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – EXPERT EVIDENCE. THE IMPROPER PROCESS BY THE THIRD PARTY EXPERT CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION TO THE PROCEDURE SUCEPTIBLE OF BEING REGULARIZE. Read
Section A - Legal Communication from our Members – HOGAN LOVELLS – Relief for Borrowers due to COVID 19 Read
Section B - Historical Precedents – FINE. APPLICABLE WHEN A COMPLAINT IS CAUSED BY A FAILURE TO ENFORCE A JUDGMENT. Read